It seems that it twee had to
do with the
(to which
منعم
1876 afflication,
Haffears to
ho answer
B
I would in
Lis
have been given) the frist instance send this
to heim for refort. You will see (6.6.81 1914
in alignial
888.) Shah Sir J. Hennessy affarently Lauried the matter through just before he left (theiling out the words in the lease as to the afferal of the toft.) & I think, Le should be welled upon for an explanation, sending Ru all the Enclones but not the covering Desf. When Mr. Chadwick
might take his ofeinon
alives
Lein
& we shall then be able better
of
what to do. it secure
to judge
deniable to
Encourage
He objech
ว
Pub1ns
2
208
offer
of the Chinese. Petitioners, & Fonts ofecially consult, but Drice as to the pomilility of of the altanative Resforals of the good is
one an
In Dowdler, but if the
to
we
as
Is be practically a fer lift, ought to have. Poure security to the proper management of the restitution, perhaps so
in the nomination
voice ci
Juusties
of
The Ictitioners p. 58 accently mallege a permise of a pant
as well!
of $
८०.
*
000 co
of
The Society for the Protection women & Childeen recognised lehnen Desf; of I hav: p. 120 of the
to Re only Book C. 3185) feems
off short of the pencial plan,
• Reobably
Lou
tant one
comparatively, though much is made it. I have mached Armen Jassages
of it
Page 210Page 211
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.